Tony Wang9 min readThe Biggest Reversal We Found in Prediction-Market History Wasn't the 2024 Election
Scanning Polymarket's biggest markets for the sharpest reversals: a NYC mayoral race swung 92 points in a month, beating 2024's Biden-to-Harris swap.
Prediction markets are supposed to be a real-time gauge of what people actually believe, backed by money instead of opinion. The interesting moments aren't when a market confirms what everyone already expected — they're when it reverses, when the crowd changes its mind hard and fast. We pulled full price history for the biggest political and civic reversals we could find on Polymarket and ranked them by how far they swung. The biggest one surprised us.
The biggest reversals we found, ranked
| Market | Lowest odds | Highest odds | Swing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zohran Mamdani wins 2025 NYC mayoral election | 3.5% | 95.8% | 92.2 points |
| Kamala Harris wins the popular vote (2024) | 0.1% | 77.4% | 77.3 points |
| Kamala Harris wins the 2024 presidential election | 0.7% | 53.9% | 53.2 points |
| Joe Biden wins the 2024 presidential election | 0.1% | 50.0% | 49.9 points |
| Donald Trump wins the 2024 presidential election | 40.5% | 70.5% | 30.0 points |
An outsider's 92-point run: the biggest swing we found
Before he became one of the most closely watched races of 2025, Zohran Mamdani was priced as exactly what conventional wisdom said he was: a long shot. His odds bottomed at 3.5% on May 24 — practically written off — and were still just 18.6% on June 22, two days before the Democratic primary. Then the market didn't just adjust, it flipped: within the next three weeks, by July 12 (18 days after his stunning primary win over Andrew Cuomo), his odds were at 72.9%. From there it was a steady climb to a near-lock 95.8% by election night. A 92.2-point range is the widest of any market in this dataset — wider than either major party's candidate in the presidential race that same year.
The 2024 election: the market didn't just react, it predicted
The headline story is real: Biden opened 2024 tied with Trump at 50%, and by the day after his July 21 withdrawal his odds were essentially zero (0.1%) — a 49.9-point collapse. But the more interesting detail is in the timing. Harris's odds didn't wait for the announcement. By July 20 — the day before Biden withdrew — she was already at 18.6%, up from 1.3% before the June 27 debate that started the slide. The market had priced in a meaningful chance of a switch before it happened, then repriced sharply once it was confirmed, climbing to a peak near 54% in late August before settling into the low 40s through election day.
Trump's own swing is smaller in range (30.0 points) but has its own inflection: his odds jumped from 60.0% to 67.5% in the two days around the July 13 assassination attempt, before drifting back down as the Harris campaign consolidated support through August.
The market can be wrong right up to the finish line
Not every reversal is a mid-race prediction getting confirmed. One market — "will Kamala Harris win the popular vote" — sat at 72.7% on election day itself, November 5, 2024. A week later, it had crashed to 0.1%.
| Date | Odds Harris wins popular vote |
|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2024 | 50.0%* |
| Jul 3, 2024 (pre-withdrawal) | 15.8% |
| Jul 28, 2024 (post-withdrawal) | 61.8% |
| Sep 16, 2024 | 75.0% |
| Nov 5, 2024 (election day) | 72.7% |
| Nov 12, 2024 (results in) | 0.1% |
*January's 50% reflects thin early liquidity on a compound bet (Biden drops out and Harris becomes nominee and she wins the popular vote), not a real forecast.
This is the one reversal in our dataset that isn't a story about the market getting ahead of the news — it's a story about the market being confidently wrong until the votes were actually counted. Trump won not just the Electoral College in 2024 but the national popular vote too, breaking from the split-verdict pattern of 2000 and 2016. Right up to election day, bettors gave Harris better than 7-in-10 odds on the popular vote specifically — the single sharpest one-week move in this entire dataset happened after polls closed, not before.
What the world actually bets the most on
Reversals are about volatility, not size, and the two lists only partly overlap. The 2024 presidential race is both the #2 market by volume and home to two of our biggest reversals — but most of the rest of the volume leaderboard is sports markets that never needed the kind of dramatic repricing this piece is about:
| Event | Total volume |
|---|---|
| World Cup Winner (2026) | $4.33B |
| 2024 US Presidential Election | $3.69B |
| NBA Champion (2024-25) | $1.71B |
| Super Bowl Champion 2025 | $1.15B |
| Champions League Winner (2025) | $1.00B |
| Premier League Winner (2024-25) | $0.81B |
| Super Bowl Champion 2026 | $0.70B |
| Fed decision in January (2026) | $0.66B |
| 2024 Popular Vote Winner | $0.63B |
| Who will Trump nominate as Fed Chair? | $0.62B |
Ten events, $15.30 billion combined — and the single biggest one, the World Cup, isn't in our reversal leaderboard at all. Part of that is structural: "World Cup Winner" volume is the sum of dozens of separate per-country markets (Argentina's alone, the single largest, is $174M — a sliver of the $4.33B total), not one market that either holds steady or swings. Our reversal leaderboard tracks single outcomes, so the two lists are measuring genuinely different things: total money wagered on an entire event, versus how far any one market's own price moved.
What this shows, and what it doesn't
What holds up: the specific swing magnitudes and dates above are drawn from Polymarket's own historical price feed, not estimated or reconstructed — every number is a real traded price at that timestamp. The relative ranking (Mamdani's swing exceeding either 2024 presidential candidate's) held up when we checked it against the raw data twice.
What limits it:
- This surveys a curated set of 5 markets, not an exhaustive search. We picked outcome markets tied to publicly known major-reversal stories (the 2024 presidential candidates, the 2024 popular-vote market, the 2025 NYC mayoral race) rather than systematically scanning every high-volume market for its swing. A larger reversal could exist in a market we didn't check — Polymarket alone hosts thousands of markets, and this covers 5 of them.
- Prediction-market prices reflect what traders are willing to bet, not a scientific poll. Liquidity was thin in some markets' early days (note the flagged January 2024 popular-vote figure above) — a price on low volume is a weaker signal than the same price on high volume.
- "Odds" here means the market's implied probability (the traded price of the "Yes" share), which is a market consensus, not a certified forecast — markets can and did move on rumor, momentum, and incomplete information, not just verified news.
- Polymarket is one prediction-market platform, not the entire prediction-market industry — Kalshi, Metaculus and others sometimes price the same events differently, and we did not cross-reference this specific analysis against them.
Sources
Methodology
For the volume table, we pulled Polymarket's top 15 events by all-time trading volume directly. For the reversal analysis, we did not scan every market for the biggest swing — we selected 5 specific outcome markets tied to publicly known major-reversal stories (each 2024 US presidential candidate, the 2024 popular-vote market, and the 2025 NYC mayoral race) and pulled each one's complete daily price history (fidelity: 1 day, full available range) for the relevant outcome token, then ranked the results by swing. Swing is the simple range: highest recorded price minus lowest recorded price across the market's full history, in percentage points. Checkpoint dates in the charts (debate, assassination attempt, withdrawal, primary win, election day) are drawn from public record and matched to the nearest available price point in the pulled series, not independently verified against Polymarket's own event annotations.
Want to run your own cut? Crawlora's prediction-market data endpoints cover Polymarket event lists, market detail, and token price history (plus Kalshi and Metaculus), and pricing has the free tier.
Frequently asked questions
What is the biggest reversal ever seen in a prediction market?
Among the markets we checked, Zohran Mamdani's odds of winning the 2025 NYC mayoral election, which swung from a 3.5% long shot on May 24, 2025 to a 95.8% near-lock by election night — a 92.2-point range, almost entirely within three weeks of his June 24 Democratic primary upset over Andrew Cuomo. That's a wider swing than either major-party candidate saw in the 2024 US presidential race.
Did prediction markets predict Biden would drop out of the 2024 election?
The market anticipated it before it was official. Kamala Harris's odds of winning had already climbed to 18.6% by July 20, 2024 — the day before Biden actually withdrew — up from just 1.3% before his June 27 debate. Biden's own odds collapsed from 50% in January to 0.1% the day after his July 21 withdrawal, a 49.9-point drop.
Were prediction markets wrong about the 2024 election?
On the specific question of the popular vote, yes, right up to the end: a 'will Kamala Harris win the popular vote' market was priced at 72.7% on election day itself, November 5, 2024, then crashed to 0.1% within a week once results confirmed Trump won the popular vote too, not just the Electoral College. It's the one reversal in our dataset where the market's final pre-results price was wrong, rather than a case of the market correctly anticipating news before it broke.
What are the biggest prediction markets by trading volume?
Among the 10 highest-volume events we checked, the 2026 World Cup Winner market leads at $4.33 billion, followed by the 2024 US Presidential Election at $3.69 billion, the 2024-25 NBA Champion at $1.71 billion, and Super Bowl Champion 2025 at $1.15 billion. All 10 combined traded $15.30 billion. Volume and volatility aren't the same thing, though — the World Cup market isn't among the biggest single-outcome swings we found.
How is 'odds' or 'probability' calculated on Polymarket?
It's the market's implied probability: the traded price of a market's "Yes" share, expressed as a percentage. It reflects what traders are collectively willing to bet, not a scientific poll or certified forecast, and can move on rumor, momentum, or incomplete information as easily as on verified news.