Tony Wang12 min readWho Really Owns Your Vet? Mapping 46,000 US Veterinary Clinics and the Chains Behind Them
We mapped 46,065 US vet clinics by state. Unlike funeral homes, no single company hides behind them — ownership is split across five visible chains instead.
Veterinary care has undergone the same kind of private-equity consolidation wave as funeral homes — well documented in mainstream coverage of "surprise vet bills" and corporate roll-ups buying up local practices. After proving that Service Corporation International hides behind 158 different funeral home names, the obvious next test was whether veterinary care shows the same pattern. It partly does, but the shape is different enough to be its own finding: instead of one company dominating invisibly, ownership here is split across several mid-sized players, most of which are perfectly happy to put their name on the door.
Vet clinic density: a rural, pet-owning-state story
| Rank | State | Listings | Per 100k residents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montana | 333 | 29.09 |
| 2 | Vermont | 175 | 27.15 |
| 3 | Maine | 328 | 23.18 |
| 4 | South Dakota | 214 | 22.89 |
| 5 | Kansas | 644 | 21.63 |
| 6 | Colorado | 1,289 | 21.44 |
| 7 | New Hampshire | 298 | 21.05 |
| 8 | Iowa | 677 | 20.91 |
| 9 | Wisconsin | 1,112 | 18.62 |
| 10 | Nebraska | 371 | 18.38 |
| … | (32 states omitted) | ||
| 43 | Maryland | 747 | 11.92 |
| 44 | Texas | 3,394 | 10.70 |
| 45 | New York | 2,128 | 10.64 |
| 46 | California | 3,925 | 9.97 |
| 47 | Arizona | 709 | 9.30 |
| 48 | Nevada | 264 | 8.04 |
| 49 | Utah | 266 | 7.52 |
| 50 | District of Columbia | 46 | 6.63 |
| 51 | Hawaii | 87 | 6.07 |
Show the full 51-state ranking
| Rank | State | Per 100k residents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Montana | 29.09 |
| 2 | Vermont | 27.15 |
| 3 | Maine | 23.18 |
| 4 | South Dakota | 22.89 |
| 5 | Kansas | 21.63 |
| 6 | Colorado | 21.44 |
| 7 | New Hampshire | 21.05 |
| 8 | Iowa | 20.91 |
| 9 | Wisconsin | 18.62 |
| 10 | Nebraska | 18.38 |
| 11 | Oklahoma | 17.61 |
| 12 | Kentucky | 16.61 |
| 13 | Tennessee | 16.45 |
| 14 | Missouri | 16.44 |
| 15 | Connecticut | 16.35 |
| 16 | North Dakota | 16.14 |
| 17 | Wyoming | 15.97 |
| 18 | West Virginia | 15.74 |
| 19 | Oregon | 15.68 |
| 20 | Ohio | 15.41 |
| 21 | Minnesota | 15.38 |
| 22 | Alabama | 15.27 |
| 23 | Arkansas | 15.25 |
| 24 | Virginia | 15.02 |
| 25 | Indiana | 14.86 |
| 26 | Alaska | 14.78 |
| 27 | Pennsylvania | 14.66 |
| 28 | Louisiana | 14.16 |
| 29 | North Carolina | 14.10 |
| 30 | Michigan | 14.07 |
| 31 | Florida | 14.05 |
| 32 | Mississippi | 13.91 |
| 33 | Delaware | 13.87 |
| 34 | Washington | 13.85 |
| 35 | South Carolina | 13.61 |
| 36 | Rhode Island | 13.01 |
| 37 | New Mexico | 12.94 |
| 38 | Illinois | 12.85 |
| 39 | Georgia | 12.78 |
| 40 | Idaho | 12.66 |
| 41 | Massachusetts | 12.41 |
| 42 | New Jersey | 11.96 |
| 43 | Maryland | 11.92 |
| 44 | Texas | 10.70 |
| 45 | New York | 10.64 |
| 46 | California | 9.97 |
| 47 | Arizona | 9.30 |
| 48 | Nevada | 8.04 |
| 49 | Utah | 7.52 |
| 50 | District of Columbia | 6.63 |
| 51 | Hawaii | 6.07 |
This is the narrowest spread of any per-capita ranking we've built on this dataset — 4.8x from top to bottom, versus 12.9x for funeral homes and a much wider spread for religious buildings. Montana, Vermont, Maine, South Dakota, and Kansas leading reads as a rural-and-outdoorsy pattern: more livestock and working animals per capita in farm states, plus (plausibly) higher pet ownership rates in less densely populated regions generally. The bottom is dense and urban — California, New York, DC, Hawaii — where sky-high real estate costs likely support fewer, larger clinics per resident rather than many small ones. Notably, this ranking doesn't track either of our two previous "per-building" rankings (church density's Bible Belt shape, funeral homes' Appalachian/Farm Belt shape) — a genuinely distinct geography, evidence that these physical-building density patterns aren't just one underlying "rural states have more small buildings" effect repeating itself.
The visible chains: VCA and Banfield hide nothing
Unlike SCI in the funeral home industry, the two largest veterinary hospital chains put their names right on the door:
| Chain | Parent company | US listings | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banfield Pet Hospital | Mars, Incorporated | 1,083 | 10/10 sampled clean, every location named 'Banfield Pet Hospital,' all linking to banfield.com |
| VCA Animal Hospitals | Mars, Incorporated | 714 | 15/15 sampled clean, every location's name starts with 'VCA,' all linking to vcahospitals.com |
Both chains are exactly as clean as Kroger's Ralphs banner: a distinctive brand name, no dictionary-word collision risk, and a direct, verifiable link between every location's name and its corporate website. This is the "visible chain" pattern — big, real, easily counted, nothing to prove beyond confirming the sample is clean.
The fragmented middle: no single company dominates
Funeral homes had one company (SCI) sitting behind 15.8% of a national sample. We ran the identical test — a 500-record sample, has_website=true, deduplicated, website domain checked record by record — on veterinary clinics, expecting to find a similar hidden giant. We didn't.
| Chain | Sample hits | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| VCA | 14 | 2.8% |
| VIP Petcare / PetVet Vaccination Clinic | 11 | 2.2% |
| Petco's Vetco (Total Care / Vaccination Clinic) | 9 | 1.8% |
| Banfield | 7 | 1.4% |
| Thrive Pet Healthcare | 5 | 1.0% |
| Total identifiable chain ownership | 46 | 9.2% |
Every one of these five is directly identifiable from either the business name (VCA, Banfield, VIP Petcare, Vetco all announce themselves) or a shared website domain. No unexplained repeated domain emerged in the remaining ~91% of the sample the way dignitymemorial.com did for funeral homes — meaning either veterinary consolidation genuinely is less concentrated than death care, or the remaining consolidators (National Veterinary Associates and Compassion-First are two of the industry's largest private buyers, by public reporting) don't centralize their acquired practices under one shared website the way SCI does. Both explanations are consistent with what we can see in this dataset; we can't distinguish between them from listings data alone.
Thrive Pet Healthcare: caught mid-rebrand
Thrive is the one chain in our sample that shows both patterns at once — some locations fully branded, others completely hidden, all linking to the same thrivepetcare.com:
| Business name on Google Maps | State | Naming signal |
|---|---|---|
| Thrive Pet Healthcare - The Heights | Texas | Fully branded — "Thrive" in the name |
| River Heights Veterinary Hospital, A Thrive Pet Healthcare Partner | Illinois | Partially branded — original name kept, Thrive added as a qualifier |
| Northwest Animal Care Hospital Rehabilitation | Washington | Fully hidden — no trace of Thrive in the name at all |
| Austin Pet & Exotic Hospital | Texas | Fully hidden — same pattern |
| Hickory Small Animal Hospital, Independence | Louisiana | Fully hidden — same pattern |
This looks like a company caught mid-transition rather than a deliberate SCI-style invisibility strategy — some acquisitions get renamed quickly, others keep their original identity indefinitely, and a few sit in between with the original name plus a "Thrive Pet Healthcare Partner" tag. It's a real, live example of exactly the mechanism that made SCI hard to detect by name search alone, just caught partway through the process instead of fully applied.
How we did this, and the caveats
Every number above comes from a live search/facets call against Crawlora's Google Maps business dataset, 2026-08-26 snapshot, cross-referenced against US Census Bureau Vintage 2025 (July 1, 2025) state population estimates.
| What | Detail |
|---|---|
| Per-capita ranking | category=veterinarian, 46,065 listings summed across all 51 (50 states + DC), 15/15 sampled clean |
| VCA / Banfield | q='VCA' / q='Banfield', both scoped to category=veterinarian, 15/15 and 10/10 sampled clean |
| Consolidation-share estimate | 500-record national sample (has_website=true, sort=updated_at_desc, deduplicated by listing ID), every website domain checked individually |
| National totals for VCA/Banfield | Live search totals (714, 1,083) — larger, more authoritative counts than the 500-record sample's proportional hits, which is why the sample-based percentages above (2.8%, 1.4%) don't map 1:1 to those totals |
Caveats worth stating plainly: the 9.2% consolidation figure is a sample-based estimate, not an exhaustive census of all 46,065 listings. We only checked for domains that repeated 3+ times in the sample — any consolidator operating below that threshold, or one that (like much of the industry, by reputation) doesn't centralize under a shared domain at all, would be invisible to this method, the same limitation we flagged in the funeral-home piece. National Veterinary Associates and Compassion-First, two of the industry's largest known private acquirers, did not surface as identifiable domains in our sample — we can't tell from this data alone whether that's because they're smaller than assumed, spread too thin to hit our 3+ threshold, or simply don't share a common web platform the way SCI does. And as always: this is a live-growing dataset, so a re-pull months from now will show different totals.
If you want to run your own chain-detection or density cuts on this data, that's exactly what Crawlora's Google Maps business API is for — the same structured-data approach behind our funeral home consolidation, regional grocery, and church density studies.
Query 132M+ Google Maps business listings directly
Crawlora's Google Maps dataset turns business listings into structured, queryable JSON — filter and facet by category, country, state, county, city, rating, and website status. 2,000 free credits a month, no card.
Frequently asked questions
Which US state has the most veterinary clinics per capita?
Montana, at 29.09 veterinary clinics per 100,000 residents — followed by Vermont (27.15), Maine (23.18), South Dakota (22.89), and Kansas (21.63). This is a rural, outdoorsy-state pattern rather than a Bible Belt or Farm Belt shape, and it's the narrowest per-capita spread (4.8x top to bottom) of any category we've measured on this dataset.
Is veterinary care as consolidated as the funeral home industry?
By ownership share, no — at least not detectably. A 500-record national sample found only 9.2% total identifiable corporate ownership split across five different chains, versus Service Corporation International's single-company 15.8% share of funeral homes. No single veterinary chain came close to SCI's dominance in our sample.
Are VCA and Banfield hiding their ownership like SCI does with funeral homes?
No — the opposite. Every VCA and Banfield location we sampled (15/15 and 10/10) carried the brand name directly in the business name and linked to the company's own website (vcahospitals.com, banfield.com). Both are owned by Mars, Incorporated, but operate as fully visible, easily searchable chains, the same clean pattern as Kroger's Ralphs banner.
Does any veterinary chain hide its ownership the way SCI does?
Partially — Thrive Pet Healthcare. Some of its locations are clearly branded ('Thrive Pet Healthcare - The Heights'), while others are fully hidden behind unrelated original names ('Northwest Animal Care Hospital Rehabilitation,' 'Austin Pet & Exotic Hospital') that link to the same thrivepetcare.com website. It reads as a company caught mid-rebrand rather than a deliberate invisibility strategy.
Why didn't National Veterinary Associates (NVA), a major private veterinary consolidator, show up in this data?
It's possible NVA doesn't centralize its acquired practices under one shared website the way SCI does with dignitymemorial.com, which would make it invisible to a website-domain cross-check like ours. It's also possible NVA-owned practices simply didn't appear often enough in our 500-record sample to cross our 3-repeat detection threshold. We can't distinguish between these explanations from listings data alone.