America's Funeral Homes, Mapped — and the One Company Hiding Behind 158 Different Names

Every piece we've written on this dataset has used the same basic move: pick a category or a brand, count it by state, normalize to population. Funeral homes seemed like a natural next stop after church density — same "physical building, same kind of essential local institution" logic. The per-capita ranking came out clean and genuinely different from the church piece. But the more interesting question turned out to be one we asked afterward: does this industry show the same hidden-ownership pattern we proved in grocery? It does — and proving it required abandoning the search-based method entirely.

Funeral home density: a rural story, not a religious one

Rank	State	Listings	Per 100k residents
1	West Virginia	319	18.06
2	Iowa	517	15.96
3	Mississippi	459	15.54
4	South Dakota	136	14.54
5	North Dakota	113	14.14
6	Nebraska	261	12.93
7	Pennsylvania	1,659	12.70
8	Arkansas	376	12.07
9	Vermont	76	11.79
10	Kentucky	531	11.53
…	(31 states omitted)
42	New Mexico	81	3.81
43	Idaho	75	3.70
44	Oregon	139	3.25
45	Washington	251	3.14
46	California	1,224	3.11
47	Utah	87	2.46
48	Nevada	58	1.77
49	Alaska	13	1.76
50	Arizona	131	1.72
51	Hawaii	20	1.40

Show the full 51-state ranking

Rank	State	Per 100k residents
1	West Virginia	18.06
2	Iowa	15.96
3	Mississippi	15.54
4	South Dakota	14.54
5	North Dakota	14.14
6	Nebraska	12.93
7	Pennsylvania	12.70
8	Arkansas	12.07
9	Vermont	11.79
10	Kentucky	11.53
11	Kansas	11.39
12	Wisconsin	10.53
13	Alabama	10.49
14	Oklahoma	10.36
15	Illinois	10.06
16	Missouri	10.02
17	Indiana	10.00
18	Louisiana	9.98
19	Rhode Island	9.96
20	Ohio	9.81
21	Maine	9.47
22	South Carolina	9.39
23	New Jersey	9.22
24	New York	9.12
25	Connecticut	9.06
26	Minnesota	8.80
27	Tennessee	8.35
28	Delaware	8.11
29	North Carolina	7.98
30	Georgia	7.94
31	Michigan	7.68
32	Massachusetts	7.55
33	Virginia	7.48
34	New Hampshire	7.21
35	Montana	7.16
36	District of Columbia	6.05
37	Wyoming	5.94
38	Texas	5.60
39	Maryland	4.98
40	Florida	4.80
41	Colorado	4.42
42	New Mexico	3.81
43	Idaho	3.70
44	Oregon	3.25
45	Washington	3.14
46	California	3.11
47	Utah	2.46
48	Nevada	1.77
49	Alaska	1.76
50	Arizona	1.72
51	Hawaii	1.40

The top of this list isn't the Bible Belt map from our church-density piece — West Virginia leads both rankings, but its company here is Iowa, South Dakota, North Dakota, and Nebraska, not Alabama, Arkansas, and Tennessee. This reads as a rural small-town infrastructure story: sparse populations spread across long distances can't consolidate mortuary services into a handful of large regional facilities the way a dense metro area can, so small towns each need their own funeral home regardless of how few residents they serve. The bottom of the list supports that reading from the other direction — it's dominated by dense, urban, and famously young-population states: Hawaii, Arizona, Alaska, Nevada, Utah, California, Washington, Oregon, Idaho.

Utah's presence at #47 is worth a specific note, because it also ranked near the bottom of our church-density piece — but for the opposite reason. There, Utah's low rank was a proven category-tagging artifact (most of its churches are mistagged into a different Google Maps category). Here, we have no evidence of a tagging problem — funeral_home is a single, clean category, and Utah's low count is consistent with a real, well-documented fact: Utah has the youngest median age of any US state, driven by comparatively high birth rates. Fewer deaths per capita is a straightforward, sufficient explanation on its own; we're not claiming to have ruled out every alternative, but there's no equivalent "hidden data" story to go looking for here.

Testing for hidden consolidation: harder than Kroger, and more revealing

Our regional grocery piece proved that a literal "Kroger" search badly undercounts Kroger Co.'s real footprint, because the company operates under ~20 different regional banners like Ralphs and Harris Teeter. The funeral home industry has undergone the same kind of private-equity consolidation — Service Corporation International (SCI), the largest player, owns funeral homes across the country — so we asked the obvious follow-up question: can we prove it the same way?

The first attempt failed for a new reason. Searching "Dignity Memorial" (SCI's marketing brand) scoped to category=funeral_home returns 1,440 hits — but sampling 20 of them showed only about a third were genuinely SCI-owned. The rest matched purely because "Memorial" is a generic word across the entire funeral industry ("Memorial Park," "Memorial Chapel," "Memorial Gardens" are standard terminology used by thousands of completely independent, family-owned funeral homes that have nothing to do with SCI). Unlike Ralphs — a distinctive, searchable brand name — SCI's acquisitions keep their original family name after being bought, specifically to preserve local trust. There is no brand name to search for, because the entire point of the acquisition strategy is that the name doesn't change.

What we tried	What happened
q='Dignity Memorial' + category=funeral_home	1,440 hits, but only ~35% (7/20 sampled) were genuinely SCI-owned — the rest matched on the generic word 'Memorial,' used industry-wide by unrelated independent funeral homes
q='Neptune Society' (SCI's cremation-focused brand)	Unfiltered, dominated by unrelated categories entirely (non_profit_organization, museum, historical_society, animal_shelter) — 'Society' collides with 'Historical Society,' 'Humane Society,' and similar org names

Since the business name carries no signal, we checked the one field that does: website. SCI-owned locations, regardless of their local name, link back to dignitymemorial.com. That field isn't full-text searchable in this dataset, so there was no query shortcut — the only way to measure it was pulling a large, unbiased sample and checking every record's website by hand (programmatically, but record by record, not via a filter).

Sample	SCI-linked (dignitymemorial.com)	Rate
First 100 records (recency-sorted, has_website=true)	20	20.0%
First 300 records	49	16.3%
Full 1,000 records, deduplicated	158	15.8%

At 15.8% and converging, roughly 1 in 6.3 US funeral homes with a website is secretly owned by Service Corporation International — a company most of their own customers have likely never heard of, under a name that appears nowhere on the building, the local advertising, or the obituary notices. No other consolidator we checked came close: Foundation Partners Group's "Altogether Funeral" brand showed up in just 0.7% of the same sample, and no other single domain repeated more than a handful of times, mostly small regional multi-location family chains rather than hidden national conglomerates.

How we did this, and the caveats

Every number above comes from a live search/facets call against Crawlora's Google Maps business dataset, 2026-08-26 snapshot, cross-referenced against US Census Bureau Vintage 2025 (July 1, 2025) state population estimates.

Caveats worth stating plainly: the 15.8% figure is a sample-based estimate, not an exhaustive census — we did not check all 21,336+ listings individually. The sample is recency-sorted, not randomly sampled — the same "sort by recency, not rating" lesson from our Walmart estimate applies, chosen specifically because it avoids the bias a popularity- or rating-based sort would introduce. We only checked for dignitymemorial.com and neptunesociety.com as SCI's two consumer-facing domains; SCI may operate other web properties we didn't test for, meaning 15.8% could be a slight undercount of SCI's true share. This measures physical funeral home locations, not funerals conducted, revenue, or market share — SCI's locations may be larger or higher-volume on average than independents, in which case its true economic footprint could be larger than its 15.8% share of listings suggests, or smaller if the opposite is true; we have no data here to say which. And as with every piece on this dataset: it's live-growing, so a re-pull months from now will show different totals.

If you want to run your own hidden-ownership or density cuts on this data, that's exactly what Crawlora's Google Maps business API is for — the same structured-data approach behind our regional grocery, church density, and chain-saturation studies.

Query 132M+ Google Maps business listings directly

Crawlora's Google Maps dataset turns business listings into structured, queryable JSON — filter and facet by category, country, state, county, city, rating, and website status. 2,000 free credits a month, no card.

Explore the Google Maps APISee pricing