Tony Wang9 min readBest Decodo (Smartproxy) Alternatives in 2026
Compare the best Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) alternatives in 2026 — structured platform APIs, premium proxy networks, and generic scraping APIs.
Decodo — rebranded from Smartproxy in April 2025, part of the Tesonet/Oxylabs group — is a value-tier proxy network with scraping APIs layered on top for categories like SERP, e-commerce, web, and social. It's a genuinely good entry point if a large, configurable proxy pool at a lower price than the enterprise players is what you need. But "proxy-first" means you're often building your own scraper on top, billed per GB of bandwidth, with anti-bot success that trails the market's benchmark leaders. This guide covers the best alternatives in 2026: what each does well, where it falls short, and when to pick it instead.
Is Decodo actually the wrong tool?
Stay with Decodo if your main need is genuinely a large, configurable proxy network at a self-serve, lower-than-enterprise price — with category scraping APIs layered on top for common targets. Look at alternatives when your need is different:
- You want a documented endpoint that returns normalized JSON, not raw proxy access you build a scraper on top of.
- You need the highest independently benchmarked anti-bot success rate, not a mid-tier result at a lower price.
- You want to avoid per-GB bandwidth metering and the risk of a trial auto-renewing to a paid plan.
- Your target is broader than SERP, e-commerce, web, and social categories and needs a wider enterprise data platform.
- The real need is arbitrary-URL scraping with a lighter, developer-first API, not a proxy network underneath your own code.
What to look for in a Decodo alternative
- Output contract: raw proxy access you build on, or a documented JSON schema per endpoint?
- Anti-bot success rate: independently benchmarked, or self-reported?
- Pricing shape: per-GB bandwidth metering, or a fixed cost per successful request?
- Trial terms: does it auto-renew to a paid card, and how easy is a refund?
- Target type: a known set of high-value platforms, or arbitrary sites you need proxies for?
- Developer trust signals: an established engineering community, or mostly affiliate-driven marketing?
The best Decodo alternatives in 2026
There is no single winner — the right pick depends on whether you need raw proxies, a documented endpoint, or a lighter generic scraping API. Here is the landscape at a glance, then a closer look at each.
| Alternative | Type | Output | Hosting | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crawlora | Structured platform API | Normalized JSON per endpoint | Hosted | Records from known platforms, no bandwidth metering |
| Bright Data | Enterprise proxy network | Raw, structured, or dataset output | Hosted | Widest proxy pool, benchmark-leading unblocker |
| Oxylabs | Enterprise proxy & scraper API | Raw HTML / structured, product-dependent | Hosted | Decodo's larger sibling, broader enterprise scale |
| Zyte | Scraping stack + Scrapy ecosystem | Raw / browser HTML, extracted data | Hosted | Benchmark-leading anti-bot for custom crawlers |
| ScrapingBee / ZenRows / ScraperAPI | Generic scraping API | Raw HTML / rendered page | Hosted | Arbitrary URLs, developer-first pricing |
| Apify | Actor marketplace & automation | Dataset (actor-defined) | Hosted | Prebuilt scrapers, scheduling, storage |
| SerpApi / DataForSEO | SERP / SEO data | Search results JSON | Hosted | Rankings and SEO datasets |
| Crawlee / Scrapy | Open-source frameworks | Whatever you extract | Self-hosted | Free scraping logic; pair with any proxy source |
1. Crawlora — structured data, no bandwidth metering
When you need normalized JSON from specific public sources — Google Search, Google Maps, Amazon, TikTok, YouTube, Product Hunt, Google Finance — a structured platform API skips proxy sourcing and per-GB metering entirely. You call a documented endpoint and get the same fields back every time:
curl -s -X POST "https://api.crawlora.net/api/v1/google/search" \
-H "x-api-key: $CRAWLORA_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"keyword": "web scraping api", "language": "en", "country": "us", "limit": 10}'
import os
import requests
resp = requests.post(
"https://api.crawlora.net/api/v1/google/search",
headers={"x-api-key": os.environ["CRAWLORA_API_KEY"]},
json={"keyword": "web scraping api", "language": "en", "country": "us", "limit": 10},
)
for row in resp.json()["data"]["result"]:
print(row["position"], row["title"], row["link"])
The response is normalized JSON you can store directly (check the API docs for the current schema; official SDKs wrap the same endpoints):
{
"code": 200,
"msg": "OK",
"data": {
"result": [
{ "position": 1, "title": "Example result", "website_name": "Example", "link": "https://example.com/", "Snippet": "Snippet text shown under the result." }
]
}
}
When to choose it: your product depends on a handful of known platforms and you want request-based credit pricing you can predict, instead of per-GB bandwidth metering and trial auto-renewal. See Crawlora vs Decodo. It is not a standalone proxy network; if your main requirement is a large, configurable proxy pool, Decodo remains a reasonable, lower-cost fit.
2. Bright Data — the widest proxy network and benchmark-leading unblocker
Bright Data sits above Decodo on scale (roughly 150M audited IPs) and independently benchmarked anti-bot success, at a correspondingly higher price and heavier procurement (KYC, monthly minimums).
When to choose it: anti-bot success rate on the hardest targets is the priority and you can absorb Bright Data's higher entry cost.
3. Oxylabs — Decodo's larger sibling, broader enterprise scale
Oxylabs is part of the same Tesonet/Oxylabs group as Decodo, but positioned for larger enterprise deployments with a broader proxy and scraper-API product line.
When to choose it: you like the group's proxy quality but need more scale, more product depth, or more enterprise support than Decodo's self-serve tier offers.
4. Zyte — benchmark-leading anti-bot for custom crawlers
Zyte has ranked #1 in independent anti-bot benchmarks (Proxyway) and provides Zyte API plus ban-handling for the Scrapy ecosystem.
When to choose it: you're building custom crawlers at scale and anti-bot success rate matters more than proxy price, with pricing structured around per-target difficulty tiers rather than raw bandwidth.
5. ScrapingBee, ZenRows, ScraperAPI — developer-first generic scraping APIs
If what you actually want is a scraping API rather than a proxy network to build on, these developer-first APIs handle proxies and JS rendering behind a single request-response call. Compare Crawlora vs ScrapingBee, vs ZenRows, and vs ScraperAPI; see also ScraperAPI alternatives.
When to choose it: your targets are arbitrary sites, you want a simpler request-based bill instead of GB metering, and you're happy to own the parsing.
6. Apify — an actor marketplace with prebuilt scrapers
Apify organizes scraping around thousands of prebuilt "Actors" plus scheduling and storage — useful if your real need is ready-made scrapers rather than proxies you build your own tooling on top of. See Apify alternatives.
When to choose it: you want a platform with prebuilt scrapers and automation rather than raw proxy access.
7. SerpApi, DataForSEO — SERP and SEO data
If what you actually need from Decodo's SERP scraping API is search results, a dedicated SERP API is more direct. SerpApi covers many engines and SERP features; DataForSEO bundles SERPs with keyword and backlink datasets.
When to choose it: rank tracking, SERP monitoring, or SEO tooling — not general proxy access.
8. Crawlee, Scrapy — free frameworks (pair with any proxy source)
Crawlee and Scrapy are mature, free open-source scraping frameworks. They don't replace a proxy network — you still need one underneath, whether that's Decodo, Oxylabs, or Bright Data — but they remove any framework licensing cost.
When to choose it: you want to own the scraping logic yourself and are choosing your proxy source independently.
Decodo's trade-offs, in plain terms
Decodo's pitch is genuinely simple: a large, configurable proxy network at a lower entry price than the enterprise players. But a few things are worth knowing before committing:
- Bandwidth is billed per GB on proxy plans, so cost scales with traffic volume, not with successful results — heavy pages and retries cost more even when they fail.
- Free trials can auto-renew into a paid plan, so check cancellation terms before starting one.
- Independent anti-bot benchmarks place Decodo in the mid-tier rather than at the top (Bright Data and Zyte lead), so expect more retries on the hardest protected targets.
- Marketing leans heavily on affiliate and review-site promotion rather than a strong organic developer community, so weigh third-party reviews accordingly.
None of this makes Decodo a bad choice for its category — a configurable, lower-cost proxy network is exactly what it's built to be. It just means the total cost of a workflow depends heavily on traffic volume and retry rate, not just the advertised per-GB rate.
Decodo vs Crawlora: feature by feature
For the most common either/or — "should I build on proxy infrastructure, or call an endpoint for records?" — here is the head-to-head:
| Decodo | Crawlora | |
|---|---|---|
| Product focus | Proxy network with category scraping APIs (SERP, e-commerce, web, social) | Structured platform API catalog |
| Output | HTML or structured results depending on API | Normalized JSON per endpoint (documented schema) |
| Targets | Broad — proxy access to most sites | Supported platforms (search, maps, commerce, social, finance) |
| Proxy network | Core product | Managed proxy routing behind supported endpoints, not a standalone product |
| Anti-bot benchmark tier | Mid-tier (independent benchmarks) | Handled behind the endpoint for supported targets |
| Pricing model | Per-GB bandwidth metering; trial auto-renews to paid | Fixed, documented credit weight per endpoint; billed only on success |
| Parsing burden | Often on you, depending on API | Handled by endpoint schemas |
| Best when | You need a configurable, lower-cost proxy network | You want a documented endpoint for a known platform, billed predictably |
How to choose
- Do you need raw proxy infrastructure to build your own scraper on, or a documented endpoint for a known platform?
- Is anti-bot success rate on hard targets the priority, or is lower entry cost more important?
- Can you tolerate per-GB bandwidth billing, or do you want a fixed cost per successful request?
- Are your targets a handful of known platforms, or broader raw web access?
- Is the real need actually SERP data or ready-made scrapers, rather than proxy infrastructure?
If the answer points to known platforms and predictable per-request pricing, a structured API like Crawlora is the cleaner fit; if it points to raw proxy infrastructure at the highest success rate, Bright Data or Zyte are the stronger picks; if a configurable, lower-cost proxy network is genuinely what you need, Decodo remains a reasonable choice.
Need a documented endpoint instead of per-GB proxy billing?
Normalized JSON, managed proxies and retries, one predictable credit weight per endpoint billed only on success. 2,000 free credits a month, no card.
Next steps
Try it first, free: turn any URL into clean Markdown with the Free Web Scraper — no signup, no API key.
Compare options on the comparison index, test a Crawlora endpoint in the Playground, browse the API docs, and wire data into an agent with the hosted MCP server.
Sources
Related reading
- Bright Data Alternatives — when the widest proxy network and enterprise scale are the actual requirement.
- Apify Alternatives — when an actor marketplace is or isn't the right shape.
- ScraperAPI Alternatives — when a generic scraper is the right fit.
- Is Web Scraping Legal in 2026? — the legal basics before you collect at scale.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best Decodo alternative?
It depends on the job. For structured records from known platforms with no bandwidth metering, use a platform API like Crawlora; for the widest proxy network and top anti-bot success rate, use Bright Data or Zyte; for broader enterprise scale from the same group, use Oxylabs; for arbitrary URLs with developer-first pricing, use ScrapingBee or ZenRows.
Is Decodo the same as Smartproxy?
Yes. Smartproxy rebranded to Decodo in April 2025. It remains part of the Tesonet/Oxylabs group and offers the same proxy network plus category scraping APIs (SERP, e-commerce, web, social) under the new name.
Is there a free Decodo alternative?
Not for a proxy network of comparable scale — proxies cost money to source at any provider. Crawlee and Scrapy are free open-source scraping frameworks, but you still need a proxy source underneath. For a hosted free tier on structured data, Crawlora includes 2,000 credits per month with no card.
Why does Decodo's pricing get expensive?
Proxy plans are billed per GB of bandwidth, so cost scales with traffic volume rather than successful results — heavy pages and retries cost more even when they fail. Free trials can also auto-renew into a paid plan, so check cancellation terms before starting one.
Decodo vs Crawlora — what is the difference?
Decodo is a proxy network with category scraping APIs layered on top; output and anti-bot handling vary by API and you often own the parsing. Crawlora is a structured platform API: call a documented endpoint for a known platform and get the same normalized JSON fields every time, billed on success with one predictable credit weight.
When should I keep using Decodo?
When your main requirement is a large, configurable proxy network at a lower entry price than the enterprise players, with category scraping APIs layered on top for common targets like SERP or e-commerce.