Crawlora
ProductPlatformsUse CasesDocsPricingCompare
Sign inTry Playground Console
Crawlora

Structured public web data APIs for search, maps, geocoding, streaming, travel, real estate, marketplaces, apps, social, audio, crypto, finance, and AI workflows with managed execution and credit-based usage.

Product

Web Scraping APIFeaturesInfrastructure FeaturesPlatformsTravel APIsReal Estate APIsPricing

Platforms

Google SearchGoogle TrendsBingBraveGoogle MapsDatasetsGeocodingJustWatchAirbnbTripAdvisorZillowCoinGeckoYahoo FinanceGoogle FinanceAmazon

Developers

DocsGetting StartedAuthenticationAPI ExamplesRecipesShowcasesBlogChangelogPlaygroundSDKsIntegrationsMCPGitHub

Use cases

SERP MonitoringGoogle Maps LeadsTravel & Hospitality ResearchProperty Market IntelligenceApp Review AnalysisReview & Reputation MonitoringTikTok Trend IntelligenceYouTube Creator IntelligenceAmazon Product MonitoringMusic Catalog / Playlist IntelligencePodcast & Audio IntelligenceCrypto Market ResearchFinance Market DataAI Agent Web Data

Legal

TermsPrivacy
Product
Web Scraping APIFeaturesInfrastructure FeaturesPlatformsTravel APIsReal Estate APIsPricing
Platforms
Google SearchGoogle TrendsBingBraveGoogle MapsDatasetsGeocodingJustWatchAirbnbTripAdvisorZillowCoinGeckoYahoo FinanceGoogle FinanceAmazon
Developers
DocsGetting StartedAuthenticationAPI ExamplesRecipesShowcasesBlogChangelogPlaygroundSDKsIntegrationsMCPGitHub
Use cases
SERP MonitoringGoogle Maps LeadsTravel & Hospitality ResearchProperty Market IntelligenceApp Review AnalysisReview & Reputation MonitoringTikTok Trend IntelligenceYouTube Creator IntelligenceAmazon Product MonitoringMusic Catalog / Playlist IntelligencePodcast & Audio IntelligenceCrypto Market ResearchFinance Market DataAI Agent Web Data
Legal
TermsPrivacy

© 2026 Built with 💖 by Tony Wang

|System:Crawlora API status
  1. Home
  2. /Showcases
  3. /YouTube
  4. /lXUZvyajciY

YouTube video intelligence showcase

Andrej Karpathy on why AI agents are a decade-long project

Andrej Karpathy explains why he sees AI agents as a decade-long project, not an imminent breakthrough, pointing to missing capabilities like continual learning, multimodality, and reliable computer use. He reflects on past AI shifts and argues that current systems are impressive but still early.

Dwarkesh PatelAgent timelinesCurrent bottlenecksAI history and lessons2 hrs 26 minOct 17, 20256 comment sample
Transcript API Comments API Source video

Build this with Crawlora

Video intelligence API workflow

Video ID
lXUZvyajciY
Available APIs
TranscriptCommentsMetadata
YouTube transcript API YouTube comments API YouTube video metadata API YouTube scraping API Creator intelligence workflow Pricing Source video
Open transcript in Playground Open comments in Playground Get API key

cURL

curl "https://api.crawlora.net/api/v1/youtube/transcript/lXUZvyajciY" \
  -H "x-api-key: $CRAWLORA_API_KEY"

Video summary

Why Karpathy says it’s the “decade of agents,” not the year of agents

In this conversation with Dwarkesh Patel, Andrej Karpathy explains why he thinks AI agents will take about a decade to mature. He argues that the industry is overpredicting near-term progress, since current systems still lack key capabilities such as continual learning, strong multimodality, and reliable computer use. Karpathy also reflects on earlier AI waves, including deep learning, reinforcement learning on games, and the rise of LLMs, to show how the field has repeatedly tried to build full agents before the underlying representations were ready. He further distinguishes AI systems from animals, saying we are not building animals but “ghosts” or digital entities trained from human data.

Agents are promising, but not ready

Karpathy argues that today’s agents are impressive but still far from the reliability needed to function like an employee or intern.

What’s still missing

He points to missing pieces like multimodality, computer use, continual learning, and broader cognitive capability as major bottlenecks.

Why he expects a decade

The discussion contrasts short-term hype with Karpathy’s longer timeline, based on nearly two decades of experience in AI.

Lessons from past AI turns

Karpathy revisits major shifts in AI—from deep learning to Atari RL to LLMs—and says the field has repeatedly moved too early toward full agents.

Topics

Agent timelines

Karpathy’s case for a slower agent timeline and why “the decade of agents” is more realistic than “the year of agents.”

Current bottlenecks

The technical gaps that still prevent agents from working like useful employees or interns.

AI history and lessons

How past waves in AI shaped Karpathy’s view of what should come before full agents.

Audience comments snapshot

Audience reactions center on Karpathy’s charisma and the show’s draw

The sampled comments mostly focus on Karpathy’s delivery, with viewers joking about his rapid speaking and laughter, and noting the strong pull of a Karpathy-Dwarkesh conversation. A few comments also highlight the appeal of guests who are familiar with the podcast and engage with it as listeners themselves.

Sampled comments
6
Visible likes
8146
Public replies
177

Comment themes

Charisma and format over substantive discussion

The public sample leans more toward lightweight, personality-driven reactions than detailed debate about the episode’s technical arguments.

Strong appeal of the Karpathy-Dwarkesh combination

The comments suggest the guest-host combination itself is a major audience draw, independent of the topic.

Audience signals

Karpathy’s speed becomes a running joke

Several commenters joke about Karpathy’s fast speech or delivery, with one saying his “tokens/sec” is breaking their context window and another quipping that it’s not running on 2x speed.

Positive reactions to Karpathy’s personality

Viewers mention Karpathy’s laugh and overall presence as enjoyable or comforting.

High anticipation for the pairing

Some comments treat a Karpathy and Dwarkesh episode as must-watch listening and say they clear their schedule for it.

Podcast credibility through guest fandom

One commenter appreciates when guests reference other episodes, framing it as a sign that the podcast has become notable enough for guests to be listeners too.

Representative public comments

@vineetgundecha78722025-11-01

Karpathy's tokens/sec is breaking my context window

3300 likes47 replies
@hritiktiwari39432025-11-01

I don’t know about you guys but Karpathy’s laugh always puts a smile on my face

52 likes3 replies
@the_bond___02025-11-01

Just realised it's not running on 2x lol

3900 likes117 replies
@thomasjgallagher9242025-11-01

Köszönöm, uraim. While painting on canvas here in my studio in Kyiv, listening to two gentlemen who relish in learning and being knowledgeable in a very broad manner, I'm struck by two feelings: How nice it is to hear two immigrant North Americans at the forefront of social issues. And, despite all our current chall...

19 likes0 replies
@LosNairobi2025-11-01

Am a simple man,, I see karpathy and dwarkesh i clear my schedule

872 likes10 replies
@nateh3792025-11-01

I always love it when the guests casually mentioned they listen to other episodes. You know you’ve made it when not only do you have the coolest guests but those guests are actual fans.

3 likes0 replies
Build with YouTube comments data

Use Crawlora's YouTube comments API with the video and transcript endpoints to collect viewer language, thread activity, and audience signals.

Comments API docs Playground
Build this workflow
1Fetch video metadata

Start with the video endpoint to capture ID, channel, publish date, duration, and source context.

2Fetch transcript

Pull timestamped transcript data for summarization, search, citation, and RAG preparation.

3Fetch public comments

Collect visible audience comments to identify themes, objections, questions, and engagement signals.

4Store, analyze, report

Persist structured JSON, run analysis, and publish dashboards, alerts, or research reports.

Public transcript excerpt

Transcript

Timestamped public transcript passages group captions into readable sections, making the video easier to scan, cite, and summarize.

Public excerpt
1:25

We have some very early agents that are extremely impressive and that I use daily—Claude and Codex and so on—but I still feel there's so much work to be done. My reaction is we'll be working with these things for a decade. They're going to get better, and it's going to be wonderful. I was just reacting to the timelines of the implication. What do you think will take a decade to accomplish? What are the bottlenecks? Actually making it work. When you're talking about an agent, or what the labs have in mind and maybe what I have in mind as well, you should think of it almost like an employee or

Build with YouTube transcript data

Use Crawlora's YouTube transcript API to fetch fresh timestamped transcript data for your own server-side workflows.

API docs Sign in

Related showcases

More structured YouTube examples

Dwarkesh Patel

How GPT, Claude, and Gemini are actually trained and served – Reiner Pope

Reiner Pope explains the mechanics behind how GPT-style models are trained and served, focusing in this excerpt on inference economics. Using a roofline-style analysis of transformer execution on a GPU cluster, he shows how batch size, weight fetches, compute throughput, and KV cache access shape latency and cost. The discussion helps explain why higher-priced fast modes can stream tokens more quickly, and why serving many users together can dramatically improve efficiency.

Batch size and batchingRoofline analysis
Dwarkesh Patel

Jensen Huang on Nvidia’s Moat, Supply Chain Bottlenecks, and Whether AI Software Gets Commoditized

Jensen Huang argues that Nvidia’s moat is not just software, but the hard-to-replicate system that turns electrons into valuable tokens across a broad AI ecosystem. He also discusses supply chain constraints, upstream investments, and how Nvidia plans years ahead to scale through bottlenecks.

Nvidia’s value creationSupply chain and ecosystem
Dwarkesh Patel

Michael Nielsen on scientific progress, falsification, and the road to special relativity

Michael Nielsen and Dwarkesh Patel discuss how scientific progress is actually recognized in practice, using the history of the ether, Michelson-Morley, Lorentz, Poincaré, Einstein, and later muon experiments to show why the standard falsification story is often too simple.

Michelson-Morley and the myth of simple falsificationMultiple theories, not one target

Build this with Crawlora

Video intelligence API workflow

Video ID
lXUZvyajciY
Available APIs
TranscriptCommentsMetadata
YouTube transcript API YouTube comments API YouTube video metadata API YouTube scraping API Creator intelligence workflow Pricing Source video
Open transcript in Playground Open comments in Playground Get API key

cURL

curl "https://api.crawlora.net/api/v1/youtube/transcript/lXUZvyajciY" \
  -H "x-api-key: $CRAWLORA_API_KEY"