At its homepage, bitstamp.net is protected by Imperva (Incapsula). Typical approach to reach it reliably: Headless browser. Difficulty is per-URL, so deep pages — profiles, listings, search — are usually harder.
Needs a headless browser that runs the site's JavaScript challenge.
Typical access
JS browser
Why it didn’t pass cleanly
Bot challenge
A JS/bot challenge interstitial was served — a browser must run it.
Detected vendors
Evidence
Detection confidence: high
Homepage-level, datacenter-IP snapshot, June 13, 2026.
This is a homepage-level snapshot and can be inaccurate or out of date — anti-bot vendors update their models continuously, deep pages are usually more protected than the homepage, and difficulty is IP-sensitive: a site can read differently from a clean vs a flagged IP and even flip over time. Treat it as a directional signal, not a guarantee.
The homepage is the open front door. On a crypto site the valuable pages behave differently — here's the plan to characterise bitstamp.net before you build.
Quote / ticker
JS renderOpen but JS-rendered; numbers load via XHR.
Screener / search
rate-limitedOpen but rate-limited.
Find a real deep URL cheaply from the site’s robots.txt and sitemap.xml, then run each through the anti-bot checker. This is an advisory based on the category and bitstamp.net’s homepage result — detect the wall, never try to pass a login.